• Best of luck to the class of 2025 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here

Class of 2025 (2025 HSC CHAT) (29 Viewers)

bdanielb

New Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2025
Messages
1
Gender
Male
HSC
2000
I’m super lucky to live really close to my high school but when I go to uni it’s gonna be trains, light rail aahhhhhh
I wanna get my license but even then there’s no (cheap) parking
try renting a driveway with parking made easy its free to signup and you can negotiate
 

erin_4school

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2025
Messages
368
Location
The Trenches
Gender
Female
HSC
2025
Why is everyone so afraid for eext 1 i feel like its a very straightforward exam. the first section is the only really scary part because we could get a:

1. discursive, and depending on the question, we will use our literary theorists in the analysis, or not. most of the time that hinges on whether its a more theory-based stimulus or a fiction stimulus. regardless all you need to study for this part is 3 or so literary theorists, and some good quotes from each of them. my class does shady cosgrove, terry eagleton, and langston hughes. If we don't get literary theorist-based questions, then there's nothing we can do to study, but studying your theorists will still aid in your writing.

2. imaginative, and if you have a versatile imaginative based on your assessment task you'll be fine. most of the time the actual stimuli is very broad, usually descriptive, so just do a lot of worldbuilding (but not too much) in this part.

3. reflection, but we will only get one if we get a creative and there's virtually nothing we can do to prepare for this part. we have to write the reflection based on how the stimulus affected our writing or whatever. so there's nothing to do.

for the section 2 essay there isn't much to prepare for besides having a pretty versatile concept. my school does Worlds of Upheaval, and i specifically chose gendered upheaval because i don't think a lot of people do it, and then i did Frankenstein, Metropolis, and the original blade runner. you just need to know the contexts of your texts intimately and weave the contexts throughout. know your evidence and connect to form very explicitly in each paragraph... eg. science fiction novel, draw on science fiction themes... supremacy over nature... biblical allusion/subversion in the form of the monster and his bride. blah blah blah. im predicting/praying for an imaginative with maybe a reflection (but its a bit nerve wracking because there's no way to prepare) and an essay question about context
its just cause i haven't started studying yet lmao cause i still have 2 exams in between
 

Trial&Error

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2024
Messages
259
Gender
Female
HSC
2025
Why is everyone so afraid for eext 1 i feel like its a very straightforward exam. the first section is the only really scary part because we could get a:

1. discursive, and depending on the question, we will use our literary theorists in the analysis, or not. most of the time that hinges on whether its a more theory-based stimulus or a fiction stimulus. regardless all you need to study for this part is 3 or so literary theorists, and some good quotes from each of them. my class does shady cosgrove, terry eagleton, and langston hughes. If we don't get literary theorist-based questions, then there's nothing we can do to study, but studying your theorists will still aid in your writing.

2. imaginative, and if you have a versatile imaginative based on your assessment task you'll be fine. most of the time the actual stimuli is very broad, usually descriptive, so just do a lot of worldbuilding (but not too much) in this part.

3. reflection, but we will only get one if we get a creative and there's virtually nothing we can do to prepare for this part. we have to write the reflection based on how the stimulus affected our writing or whatever. so there's nothing to do.

for the section 2 essay there isn't much to prepare for besides having a pretty versatile concept. my school does Worlds of Upheaval, and i specifically chose gendered upheaval because i don't think a lot of people do it, and then i did Frankenstein, Metropolis, and the original blade runner. you just need to know the contexts of your texts intimately and weave the contexts throughout. know your evidence and connect to form very explicitly in each paragraph... eg. science fiction novel, draw on science fiction themes... supremacy over nature... biblical allusion/subversion in the form of the monster and his bride. blah blah blah. im predicting/praying for an imaginative with maybe a reflection (but its a bit nerve wracking because there's no way to prepare) and an essay question about context
Ummmm...now you've got me a bit panicked. Since when are we supposed to study literary theorists for section 1?? Why has my extension teacher never once mentioned that? We've done prescribed texts (the scarlet letter and john Donne's poetry) but I don't even know if they're part of the syllabus cause I can't find them on the prescribed text list. Did everybody else also do prescribed texts for section 1?
 

erin_4school

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2025
Messages
368
Location
The Trenches
Gender
Female
HSC
2025
Ummmm...now you've got me a bit panicked. Since when are we supposed to study literary theorists for section 1?? Why has my extension teacher never once mentioned that? We've done prescribed texts (the scarlet letter and john Donne's poetry) but I don't even know if they're part of the syllabus cause I can't find them on the prescribed text list. Did everybody else also do prescribed texts for section 1?
i didnt do prescribed texts for section 1, and yes, if its a discursive they will want you to have at least 1 literary theorist. I only used 1 and got a 24 for that section so u dont need many dw
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 29)

Top