finncarlygarbett
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2025
- Messages
- 118
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2025
thats how you know im going to get an e4.bro wrote an essay about essays
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
thats how you know im going to get an e4.bro wrote an essay about essays
metaessay I guessbro wrote an essay about essays
im expecting a state rank from you maamthats how you know im going to get an e4.
perm banned for being too locked in on boswait i just found out ace changed bigupsankys user and password for himis this true?? it sounds so surreal omll
how do u knowwait i just found out ace changed bigupsankys user and password for himis this true?? it sounds so surreal omll
all seeing eyehow do u know
LMAO im changing the pass back on the day he told me toperm banned for being too locked in on bos
he told me yesterday but like i only actually processed it today lolhow do u know
thats actually so surrealLMAO im changing the pass back on the day he told me to
try renting a driveway with parking made easy its free to signup and you can negotiateI’m super lucky to live really close to my high school but when I go to uni it’s gonna be trains, light rail aahhhhhh
I wanna get my license but even then there’s no (cheap) parking
its just cause i haven't started studying yet lmao cause i still have 2 exams in betweenWhy is everyone so afraid for eext 1 i feel like its a very straightforward exam. the first section is the only really scary part because we could get a:
1. discursive, and depending on the question, we will use our literary theorists in the analysis, or not. most of the time that hinges on whether its a more theory-based stimulus or a fiction stimulus. regardless all you need to study for this part is 3 or so literary theorists, and some good quotes from each of them. my class does shady cosgrove, terry eagleton, and langston hughes. If we don't get literary theorist-based questions, then there's nothing we can do to study, but studying your theorists will still aid in your writing.
2. imaginative, and if you have a versatile imaginative based on your assessment task you'll be fine. most of the time the actual stimuli is very broad, usually descriptive, so just do a lot of worldbuilding (but not too much) in this part.
3. reflection, but we will only get one if we get a creative and there's virtually nothing we can do to prepare for this part. we have to write the reflection based on how the stimulus affected our writing or whatever. so there's nothing to do.
for the section 2 essay there isn't much to prepare for besides having a pretty versatile concept. my school does Worlds of Upheaval, and i specifically chose gendered upheaval because i don't think a lot of people do it, and then i did Frankenstein, Metropolis, and the original blade runner. you just need to know the contexts of your texts intimately and weave the contexts throughout. know your evidence and connect to form very explicitly in each paragraph... eg. science fiction novel, draw on science fiction themes... supremacy over nature... biblical allusion/subversion in the form of the monster and his bride. blah blah blah. im predicting/praying for an imaginative with maybe a reflection (but its a bit nerve wracking because there's no way to prepare) and an essay question about context
HSC exam timetable?Is there a full timetable available somewhere?
all i needs a 97.7...ripguys is anyone else going to (or hoping) to go to unsw? ive been doomscrolling their insta page and societies and im lowkey so excited!!
cause im trashWhy is everyone so afraid for eext 1 i feel like its a very straightforward exam. the first section is the only really scary part because we could get a:
Ummmm...now you've got me a bit panicked. Since when are we supposed to study literary theorists for section 1?? Why has my extension teacher never once mentioned that? We've done prescribed texts (the scarlet letter and john Donne's poetry) but I don't even know if they're part of the syllabus cause I can't find them on the prescribed text list. Did everybody else also do prescribed texts for section 1?Why is everyone so afraid for eext 1 i feel like its a very straightforward exam. the first section is the only really scary part because we could get a:
1. discursive, and depending on the question, we will use our literary theorists in the analysis, or not. most of the time that hinges on whether its a more theory-based stimulus or a fiction stimulus. regardless all you need to study for this part is 3 or so literary theorists, and some good quotes from each of them. my class does shady cosgrove, terry eagleton, and langston hughes. If we don't get literary theorist-based questions, then there's nothing we can do to study, but studying your theorists will still aid in your writing.
2. imaginative, and if you have a versatile imaginative based on your assessment task you'll be fine. most of the time the actual stimuli is very broad, usually descriptive, so just do a lot of worldbuilding (but not too much) in this part.
3. reflection, but we will only get one if we get a creative and there's virtually nothing we can do to prepare for this part. we have to write the reflection based on how the stimulus affected our writing or whatever. so there's nothing to do.
for the section 2 essay there isn't much to prepare for besides having a pretty versatile concept. my school does Worlds of Upheaval, and i specifically chose gendered upheaval because i don't think a lot of people do it, and then i did Frankenstein, Metropolis, and the original blade runner. you just need to know the contexts of your texts intimately and weave the contexts throughout. know your evidence and connect to form very explicitly in each paragraph... eg. science fiction novel, draw on science fiction themes... supremacy over nature... biblical allusion/subversion in the form of the monster and his bride. blah blah blah. im predicting/praying for an imaginative with maybe a reflection (but its a bit nerve wracking because there's no way to prepare) and an essay question about context
i didnt do prescribed texts for section 1, and yes, if its a discursive they will want you to have at least 1 literary theorist. I only used 1 and got a 24 for that section so u dont need many dwUmmmm...now you've got me a bit panicked. Since when are we supposed to study literary theorists for section 1?? Why has my extension teacher never once mentioned that? We've done prescribed texts (the scarlet letter and john Donne's poetry) but I don't even know if they're part of the syllabus cause I can't find them on the prescribed text list. Did everybody else also do prescribed texts for section 1?
