iloveeggs
#1 nesa hater
unpopular opinion but the requirements are not that unreasonable in my opinion. if you can't make the cut in penrith i think its not worth moving to girra/baulko etc. to go do the subjects you want to bc in those schools its actually harder to rank better.Penrith sucks ass cause you cant do the subjects you wanna do and have to deal with a shit load of requirements
in y10 you have to make top 48 for phys (top 33%) and top 72 for chem and e1 maths (top 50%). in y11 you have to be top 24 in the e1 cohort to make 4u. if you look at the number of band 6s in the cohort, if you are good enough to make it in you are likely good enough to band 6 or do well enough to not drag the high performing students down. and thats in PENRITH not girra or another higher ranking school, so how does that translate across to a higher ranking school if you're like below top 33% in penrith?
penrith actually has these restrictions because of staffing restrictions as a main reason (which ensures most of their staff is qualified to teach that subject and aren't teaching out of their area of expertise) and in order to deter people that drag the cohort down from joining so they can have overall a higher number of band 6s. sounds really harsh but in reality it is what keeps the median atar high and since most people there want a 95+ atar most ppl aren't extremely pissed abt it bc most ppl make it into chem and e1 at least and that means they are in a high performing cohort.
so ultimately if you are smart you will thrive either way ngl. if you are struggling to meet cut offs at penrith for anything other than 4u maths and maybe physics i would be a bit concerned