Huge far-right, white supremacist rallies scheduled to be held across Australia on August 31st (5 Viewers)

[Tony Stark]

Yes dumb dumb, we're discussing immigration, and then you started talking a bunch of nonsense about 'defenceless women and children'.

Which is unrelated to religion...I'm getting more and more convinced that you should've gone to specsavers

 

[Slayon]

They almost never did that, bozo. If you think the British rocked up to Australia and started killing everyone they saw, you are completely delusional. Mitochondrial DNA evidence shows that very few lineages have been lost and almost all violent deaths were in conflicts over land in which the violence was mostly initiated by aborigines (even if you think this is justified, it's categorically different to your insane view of the british wantonly shooting any aborigine they could find or something). In fact, it was aborigines who attacked the British on sight at the very start. They must have been a bunch of xenophobic bigots who didn't want to accept multiculturalism!

And guns weren't the main reason Europeans were able to build globe spanning empires anyway. I mean, European soldiers from 2500 years ago using only melee weapons would absolutely stomp aborigines.

And it's so hilarious seeing a muslim cry about conquest. You people have been engaging in brutal conquest for 1400 years and none of you have ever once pretended to feel bad about it. The only reason you never came close to conquering the world the way Europeans did was because you couldn't. And we know for certain than if you did, you would be celebrating this fact. And of course, you pretend to care about 'defenceless women', and yet the holy prophet of islam literally took women as slaves lmao Oh and of course, the aborigines you're so eagerly defending would often fighter against each other, and the winning side would take (as in, kidnap) the women from the losing side as wives. This is far worse than what the majority of

This is ironic, isn't it? First of all, at no point was it claimed the Europeans "started killing everyone they saw" weapons were used as a threat, and for someone so blindly pro-white I think you'd be able to assume Europeans would save their resources instead of "wasting" ammo. Your "evidence" claiming few lineages were lost make me confident that you'd be the last person i'd ask for help on my science homework - maybe just homework in general. Compared to historical populations, only 2 percent of Aboriginals live today. Your use of "aborigines", a racist slur, proves your lackluster understanding on this topic. But for a 30-something-year-old arguing with teenagers on a student forum, I'm not surprised. No, Europeans without melee weapons wouldn't be able to "stomp" Aboriginals as weapons were there main means of threat. Aboriginals had complex weapons at the time, especially a country without as mean resources as Europe. Your final argument is a comment of somebody's race; somehow being related to this topic. However, it's just another failed attempt at fullfilling your fragile ego.

 

[Slayon]

Do you have any evidence whatsoever that they ever deliberately spread deadly diseases?

Yes, there are various jars from ships following up the first fleet that contains various scabs used to spread diseases (thankyou my year 8 teacher) and it was also in writing, directions to spread the disease. Feel free to search it up, as it seems you have plenty of time on your hands. At least enough to argue with teenagers on a student forum in arguments where you are clearly wrong.

 

[Slayon]

White Australians are constantly told that 'you're immigrants too'. Well, that means that 'immigrants' colonized Australia, and aborigines violently attacked european 'immigrants' the moment they set foot in Australia. Are these 'immigrants' good too? Or do they only count as 'immigrants' when its convenient?

Immigrants are a label for individuals that go to another country other than your own, however it seems Sylvia has they're own definition...

 

[Slayon]

I recommend reading this: https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2023/12/fertility-questions-the-role-of-population-density/

What you've said cannot explain global declines in fertility

I feel so bad that nobody in high school taught you how to find accurate, valid and reliable sources. For starters, maybe don't use research written by somebody who wants to legalise child porn or has an unrelated bachelor in relationship to this research (Emil Kirkeegard)

 

[qweeosh]

@Slayon the goat

 

[Slayon]

@Slayon the goat

awwww thank you!! <3

 

[enoilgam]

@Slayon the goat

Im going to give you all some free advice. SylviaB has been trolling BoS since before many of you were born. He is a MASTER of subtly using every logical fallacy in the book to bamboozle people and anger them into arguments. Engaging in arguments with him is a waste of time, because he will use his skill and years of experience to get under your skin.

Easiest way to beat him, dont engage. If no one ever quoted him and completely ignored his arguments in threads, he would disappear. Users are obsessed with being right and in doing so, argue with Sylvia and therefore lose. You're goal should be to win and if you ignore him, that will frustrate him 100 times more than arguing back ever could. In life, winning is more important than being right - so please, when dealing with Sylvia play to win. Ignore him or argue around him, dont argue with him

 

[qweeosh]

Im going to give you all some free advice. SylviaB has been trolling BoS since before many of you were born. He is a MASTER of subtly using every logical fallacy in the book to bamboozle people and anger them into arguments. Engaging in arguments with him is a waste of time, because he will use his skill and years of experience to get under your skin.

Easiest way to beat him, dont engage. If no one ever quoted him and completely ignored his arguments in threads, he would disappear. Users are obsessed with being right and in doing so, argue with Sylvia and therefore lose. You're goal should be to win and if you ignore him, that will frustrate him 100 times more than arguing back ever could. In life, winning is more important than being right - so please, when dealing with Sylvia play to win. Ignore him or argue around him, dont argue with him

Lmao I think that’s pretty clear, I hope I didn’t pass on as someone who took it all seriously lol. I was honestly just pretty bored

 

[99.95dreams]

Im going to give you all some free advice. SylviaB has been trolling BoS since before many of you were born. He is a MASTER of subtly using every logical fallacy in the book to bamboozle people and anger them into arguments. Engaging in arguments with him is a waste of time, because he will use his skill and years of experience to get under your skin.

Easiest way to beat him, dont engage. If no one ever quoted him and completely ignored his arguments in threads, he would disappear. Users are obsessed with being right and in doing so, argue with Sylvia and therefore lose. You're goal should be to win and if you ignore him, that will frustrate him 100 times more than arguing back ever could. In life, winning is more important than being right - so please, when dealing with Sylvia play to win. Ignore him or argue around him, dont argue with him

lowk why does this feel like one of those inspirational talks a general would give to his soliders before engaging in combat help
but thanks for the advice lol

 

[Slayon]

Im going to give you all some free advice. SylviaB has been trolling BoS since before many of you were born. He is a MASTER of subtly using every logical fallacy in the book to bamboozle people and anger them into arguments. Engaging in arguments with him is a waste of time, because he will use his skill and years of experience to get under your skin.

Easiest way to beat him, dont engage. If no one ever quoted him and completely ignored his arguments in threads, he would disappear. Users are obsessed with being right and in doing so, argue with Sylvia and therefore lose. You're goal should be to win and if you ignore him, that will frustrate him 100 times more than arguing back ever could. In life, winning is more important than being right - so please, when dealing with Sylvia play to win. Ignore him or argue around him, dont argue with him

I understand what you're saying, and I agree, arguing with Syliva is like talking to a brick wall. This I understand - i'm using these conversations with Sylvia for debate practice because practice has been cancelled until term 4 , and Sylvia manages to capture the essences of a real debate; more so than AI. Because in a real debate, it's not against real intelligible people but people who refuse to budge, create false evidence, and play unfair. However, in saying this, I acknowledge why my conversations with Syliva may seem genuine. My goal is not to frustrate him, but too build tactics for argument - mainly, how to convince someone who is unconvicable. I no longer plan to continue with this conversation, as I feel fulfilled with what I said, and hope to provide some form of understanding for anyone who chooses to read this thread.

 

[enoilgam]

lowk why does this feel like one of those inspirational talks a general would give to his soliders before engaging in combat help
but thanks for the advice lol

I do enjoy strategy and tactics - I was going to quote the Art of War but it didnt fit (good read, I recommend it to all of you).

 

[banigul@30]

im gonna ask my white physics teacher tmr if hes going (he has an asain wife)

is your phys teacher really old and has been in the school for 35 years +? cause that's sounding a lot like my physics teacher

 

[qweeosh]

I do enjoy strategy and tactics - I was going to quote the Art of War but it didnt fit (good read, I recommend it to all of you).

Have you read Machiavelli's? It's rather different from Sun Tzu's and I wonder what your thoughts are on the similarities and differences.

 

[Tony Stark]

Im going to give you all some free advice. SylviaB has been trolling BoS since before many of you were born. He is a MASTER of subtly using every logical fallacy in the book to bamboozle people and anger them into arguments. Engaging in arguments with him is a waste of time, because he will use his skill and years of experience to get under your skin.

Easiest way to beat him, dont engage. If no one ever quoted him and completely ignored his arguments in threads, he would disappear. Users are obsessed with being right and in doing so, argue with Sylvia and therefore lose. You're goal should be to win and if you ignore him, that will frustrate him 100 times more than arguing back ever could. In life, winning is more important than being right - so please, when dealing with Sylvia play to win. Ignore him or argue around him, dont argue with him

The stupidity of the 30 year old's words is entertaining...though this is a good message to those who do care about these issues

 

[Tony Stark]

Have you read Machiavelli's? It's rather different from Sun Tzu's and I wonder what your thoughts are on the similarities and differences.

I do enjoy strategy and tactics - I was going to quote the Art of War but it didnt fit (good read, I recommend it to all of you).

Adding these to my read list

 

[qweeosh]

Adding these to my read list

Add 'The Prince' too, it's a fascinating read especially in companion with the aforementioned.

 

[jane1820]

is your phys teacher really old and has been in the school for 35 years +? cause that's sounding a lot like my physics teacher

no he joined my school in 2010

 

[enoilgam]

The stupidity of the 30 year old's words is entertaining...though this is a good message to those who do care about these issues

Honestly, he is probably closer to 40 than 30.

Have you read Machiavelli's? It's rather different from Sun Tzu's and I wonder what your thoughts are on the similarities and differences.

My fiance has been telling me to, Ive got it on my shelf ready to read.

 

[Pugsy99]

Aw man it got cancelled