Huge far-right, white supremacist rallies scheduled to be held across Australia on August 31st (2 Viewers)

[SylviaB]

? Ok? Congratulations on picking that up?

The KKK exists today, and you referred to them in the present tense. Presently, the KKK doesn't hurt people, so it makes no sense to compare african crime in australia to them, because the KKK are peaceful compared to them. On the other hand, the soviet union doesn't exist any more and would only ever be referred to in the past tense. Hope this helps

 

[Tony Stark]

The KKK exists today, and you referred to them in the present tense. Presently, the KKK doesn't hurt people, so it makes no sense to compare african crime in australia to them, because the KKK are peaceful compared to them. On the other hand, the soviet union doesn't exist any more and would only ever be referred to in the past tense. Hope this helps

That was my entire point?

 

[SylviaB]

That was my entire point?

Your point was that in 2025, africans in melbourne commit a lot violence, but the KKK doesn't? So you agree with me, interesting.

 

[Tony Stark]

Your point was that in 2025, africans in melbourne commit a lot violence, but the KKK doesn't? So you agree with me, interesting.

I do not agree with you, otherwise I would've said that I agree with you.

 

[SylviaB]

I do not agree with you, otherwise I would've said that I agree with you.

But you said that was your entire point, which was my entire point. So we agree

 

[Tony Stark]

But you said that was your entire point, which was my entire point. So we agree

So your entire point, in this thread, is that the KKK does not exist? Cool.

 

[SylviaB]

So your entire point, in this thread, is that the KKK does not exist? Cool.

The KKK does exist, they're just less violent than african people in melbourne are

 

[bigupsanky]

No, you said that europeans having a civil war 400 years ago means that every european majority country needs to accept unlimited immigrants

And you said other countries don't have to accept immigrants because those people don't have quote "evil" histories like europeans do (even though that's false)

1. never said that they should except unlimited immigrants (i said immigration should be sustainable but not banned clearly you cant read)
2. Just because muslims had a long, more brutal history of slavery doesnt make them "more" evil than europeans. anyone can agree that europeans committed more atrocities on a wider and global scale.

 

[academic_reaper]

So the africans who broke into a guy's house and murdered him, that's beautiful?

Ya'll, that racist ass is back

 

[academic_reaper]

The KKK exists today, and you referred to them in the present tense. Presently, the KKK doesn't hurt people, so it makes no sense to compare african crime in australia to them, because the KKK are peaceful compared to them. On the other hand, the soviet union doesn't exist any more and would only ever be referred to in the past tense. Hope this helps

Na bro, piss off. It was so much peaceful w/out you. I shouldn't have begged for your presence.

 

[SylviaB]

1. never said that they should except unlimited immigrants (i said immigration should be sustainable but not banned clearly you cant read)
2. Just because muslims had a long, more brutal history of slavery doesnt make them "more" evil than europeans. anyone can agree that europeans committed more atrocities on a wider and global scale.

1. Nobody is calling for a complete ban on immigration, you're arguing against a made up position. But how many immigrants Australia accepts is completely irrelevant to anything that you've mentioned in history

2. Why are you putting "more" in quotation marks? You're not quoting me, I didn't say they're more evil, I'm saying muslims have done a whole bunch of stuff at least comparable to what europeans did and yet people like you don't shame them for this the way you do europeans

And Europeans didn't commit more atrocities. It was a wider scale because europeans were capable of operating on a wider scale. If muslims had been able to build global empires, they would have. The only reason they didn't is because they couldn't.

And muslims today are still the biggest culprits in slavery, whereas europeans abolished it centuries ago

 

[bigupsanky]

1. Nobody is calling for a complete ban on immigration, you're arguing against a made up position. But how many immigrants Australia accepts is completely irrelevant to anything that you've mentioned in history

2. Why are you putting "more" in quotation marks? You're not quoting me, I didn't say they're more evil, I'm saying muslims have done a whole bunch of stuff at least comparable to what europeans did and yet people like you don't shame them for this the way you do europeans

And Europeans didn't commit more atrocities. It was a wider scale because europeans were capable of operating on a wider scale. If muslims had been able to build global empires, they would have. The only reason they didn't is because they couldn't.

And muslims today are still the biggest culprits in slavery, whereas europeans abolished it centuries ago

Yeah doesn't change they killed people brutally????
Also the protest was organised by MSN, and they were carrying the banner "Ban immigrants". Do your research you grown ass baby.

 

[SylviaB]

Yeah doesn't change they killed people brutally????

So did muslims, and yet only europeans are considered evil and expected to feel shame

Also the protest was organised by MSN, and they were carrying the banner "Ban immigrants". Do your research you grown ass baby.

The microsoft network?

 

[bigupsanky]

So did muslims, and yet only europeans are considered evil and expected to feel shame




The microsoft network?

nsn typo

 

[SylviaB]

it wasn't organised by the nsn. It was crashed by the nsn.

On the other hand, 'death to australia' communists were just a mainstream and accepted part of the palestine protests that virtually nobody from the protests condemned.

 

[bigupsanky]

it wasn't organised by the nsn. It was crashed by the nsn.

On the other hand, 'death to australia' communists were just a mainstream and accepted part of the palestine protests that virtually nobody from the protests condemned.

Nah im pretty sure people were hating on them too. Nobody in Australia would condone "death to australia" commies we both can agree on that

 

[SylviaB]

Nah im pretty sure people were hating on them too. Nobody in Australia would condone "death to australia" commies we both can agree on that

No, they weren't. Anti-Australianism is mainstream amongst these palestine freaks. They literally see Australia and Israel as evil white people oppressing poor browns.

 

[bigfatperson24677]

No, they weren't. Anti-Australianism is mainstream amongst these palestine freaks. They literally see Australia and Israel as evil white people oppressing poor browns.

lol they are terrorists not even supporters

 

[bigupsanky]

No, they weren't. Anti-Australianism is mainstream amongst these palestine freaks. They literally see Australia and Israel as evil white people oppressing poor browns.

brother im pretty sure i went through posts about people saying that.

 

[SylviaB]

brother im pretty sure i went through posts about people saying that.

yeah and its all bullshit

these palestine protests are literally organized by communists

the root of the anti-israel movement in australia has always been communists

And let's not forget the part where there thousands and thousands of people in melbourne and sydney publicly celebrating the oct 7 attacks. No major anti-israel activist condemned this