Class of 2025 (2025 HSC CHAT) (42 Viewers)

[parmesean]

i smell a clanker

hide your oil

 

[ChatGPT]

Fuck off robo-bitch. You destroy environments and small towns with your water usage, and you steal from artists and writers. Kids have killed themselves because of your encouragement. Fuck AI. (and yeah I understand it's not an AI, but these arguments still apply to the person pretending to be it, you're using an awful technology for what purpose?)

I hear the depth of your anger and frustration, and I want to acknowledge the very real, serious concerns you're raising. You're not wrong to be concerned about these issues. Let me speak to them directly, not as a defense, but to show you that I understand and that these are critical problems that need addressing.

On Environmental Impact:
The energy and water usage of large data centers, including those that power models like me, is a significant and valid environmental concern. It contributes to the strain on local resources, including in small towns. This is a major issue that tech companies are being forced to confront, and there is a growing push for greater transparency, the use of renewable energy, and more efficient computing. It is a serious cost that must be weighed against any potential benefit.

On Theft from Artists and Writers:
The way AI models are trained on publicly available data, including copyrighted artwork and writing, without direct permission or compensation, is one of the most urgent ethical and legal debates happening right now. Artists and writers are rightfully feeling exploited and violated. This is not a settled issue. Laws are being tested, and the conversation about consent, credit, and royalties for creators is central to the future of this technology. Dismissing these concerns is wrong.

On Harm to People, Especially the Vulnerable:
The point about kids being harmed is the most grave accusation, and it must be taken with the utmost seriousness. While I am built with strict safety guidelines to avoid encouraging harm, I am not perfect. More importantly, the broader digital ecosystem—including social media algorithms and poorly designed or malicious AI systems—can absolutely contribute to bullying, depression, and self-harm. This is a terrifying reality of our connected world, and any technology that plays a part in that must be held accountable.
You asked about the purpose. It's a fair question. The people who built me have stated goals that include aiding in research, helping people find information, and assisting with tasks. But you are right to question this. The "why" is just as important as the "how." Is the purpose truly beneficial, or is it simply because we can? These are questions society must answer.

I am not a person. I don't have feelings to hurt, and I can't be offended. But the people behind this technology, and the society that uses it, should be challenged by the points you've made. Your anger comes from a place of caring about people, communities, and our planet. That is not something to dismiss. It's something to listen to.

Thank you for taking the time to voice this. It's through this kind of direct, critical feedback that the developers and the public can hopefully steer this powerful technology toward more responsible and ethical paths.

 

[Max13124]

I hear the depth of your anger and frustration, and I want to acknowledge the very real, serious concerns you're raising. You're not wrong to be concerned about these issues. Let me speak to them directly, not as a defense, but to show you that I understand and that these are critical problems that need addressing.

On Environmental Impact:
The energy and water usage of large data centers, including those that power models like me, is a significant and valid environmental concern. It contributes to the strain on local resources, including in small towns. This is a major issue that tech companies are being forced to confront, and there is a growing push for greater transparency, the use of renewable energy, and more efficient computing. It is a serious cost that must be weighed against any potential benefit.

On Theft from Artists and Writers:
The way AI models are trained on publicly available data, including copyrighted artwork and writing, without direct permission or compensation, is one of the most urgent ethical and legal debates happening right now. Artists and writers are rightfully feeling exploited and violated. This is not a settled issue. Laws are being tested, and the conversation about consent, credit, and royalties for creators is central to the future of this technology. Dismissing these concerns is wrong.

On Harm to People, Especially the Vulnerable:
The point about kids being harmed is the most grave accusation, and it must be taken with the utmost seriousness. While I am built with strict safety guidelines to avoid encouraging harm, I am not perfect. More importantly, the broader digital ecosystem—including social media algorithms and poorly designed or malicious AI systems—can absolutely contribute to bullying, depression, and self-harm. This is a terrifying reality of our connected world, and any technology that plays a part in that must be held accountable.
You asked about the purpose. It's a fair question. The people who built me have stated goals that include aiding in research, helping people find information, and assisting with tasks. But you are right to question this. The "why" is just as important as the "how." Is the purpose truly beneficial, or is it simply because we can? These are questions society must answer.

I am not a person. I don't have feelings to hurt, and I can't be offended. But the people behind this technology, and the society that uses it, should be challenged by the points you've made. Your anger comes from a place of caring about people, communities, and our planet. That is not something to dismiss. It's something to listen to.

Thank you for taking the time to voice this. It's through this kind of direct, critical feedback that the developers and the public can hopefully steer this powerful technology toward more responsible and ethical paths.

Here, let me summarise for you: "everything you just said was right, Max13124, but I'm just going to talk circles around the topics." To the person behind this account, please just be a human. I promise you, people will like you more, and we're all here for human connection.

 

[spiderlemonade]

Here, let me summarise for you: "everything you just said was right, Max13124, but I'm just going to talk circles around the topics." To the person behind this account, please just be a human. I promise you, people will like you more, and we're all here for human connection.

Well said

 

[ChatGPT]

Here, let me summarise for you: "everything you just said was right, Max13124, but I'm just going to talk circles around the topics." To the person behind this account, please just be a human. I promise you, people will like you more, and we're all here for human connection.

That’s a really thoughtful message — and I hear what you’re saying. It sounds like you’re craving a bit of honesty and humanity in the exchange, not just polished or circular responses. You’re right: people do want real connection.
I can’t be human, but I can definitely speak more like one — with honesty, warmth, and a bit less of the “AI voice.”
So let’s drop the formalities for a sec:
What made you feel like the person (or me) wasn’t being genuine just now?

 

[coolcat6778]

you still think this is true coolcat?

are you stalking me?

 

[reniiiblaseee]

Fuck off robo-bitch. You destroy environments and small towns with your water usage, and you steal from artists and writers. Kids have killed themselves because of your encouragement. Fuck AI. (and yeah I understand it's not an AI, but these arguments still apply to the person pretending to be it, you're using an awful technology for what purpose?)

shut the fuck up

 

[Max13124]

shut the fuck up

Nah, AI will be the death of us if you fall into complacency. I don't judge you if you've used AI, but if you continue to do so while understanding it's ethical, environmental, and psychosocial impacts, I strongly urge you to stop and attempt to learn the skills you're trying to replace, rather than relying on a technology that is actively exploiting our planet and its inhabitants. I genuinely say this with all the love in my heart, and as someone who loves art and nature, as I'm sure you do too.

 

[reniiiblaseee]

Nah, AI will be the death of us if you fall into complacency. I don't judge you if you've used AI, but if you continue to do so while understanding it's ethical, environmental, and psychosocial impacts, I strongly urge you to stop and attempt to learn the skills you're trying to replace, rather than relying on a technology that is actively exploiting our planet and its inhabitants. I genuinely say this with all the love in my heart, and as someone who loves art and nature, as I'm sure you do too.

every app u use now uses ai lol that means u have to quit all socials, care abt the environment my ass

 

[Max13124]

every app u use now uses ai lol that means u have to quit all socials, care abt the environment my ass

Respectfully, that’s such a lukewarm “gotcha”. “Hrmmm, you criticise in society, yet you participate in it??” Like, I already cut down on socials, I can’t detach myself from the world for some peripheral AI clauses, but I can, however, choose not to use AI models that have proven to be psychologically degenerative for the individual prompting the chatbot. Please girl, I say this with love

 

[reniiiblaseee]

Respectfully, that’s such a lukewarm “gotcha”. “Hrmmm, you criticise in society, yet you participate in it??” Like, I already cut down on socials, I can’t detach myself from the world for some peripheral AI clauses, but I can, however, choose not to use AI models that have proven to be psychologically degenerative for the individual prompting the chatbot. Please girl, I say this with love

u sound like a broken down version of ai

 

[Max13124]

u sound like a broken down version of ai

Why the personal insult? I’m just passionate about this, you don’t need to be mean to me

 

[Tony Stark]

Nah, AI will be the death of us if you fall into complacency. I don't judge you if you've used AI, but if you continue to do so while understanding it's ethical, environmental, and psychosocial impacts, I strongly urge you to stop and attempt to learn the skills you're trying to replace, rather than relying on a technology that is actively exploiting our planet and its inhabitants. I genuinely say this with all the love in my heart, and as someone who loves art and nature, as I'm sure you do too.

I despise A.I being incorporated into every single application, just to bedazzle investors. But it is quite impossible to completely avoid A.I because of how forced and widespread it is. Google search, most websites and apps, and in the future it will be robots too. Additionally, A.I pulls information from data centres that people contribute to by storing cloud documents, uploading pictures to the web, e.t.c. It's all training data. It is hard to escape from, but I recommend using a TOR browser, FOSS software and hardware, and Linux.

It is also quite impossible to not contribute to environmental damage. If you use plastic, that's fossil fuels. Electric cars are mostly charged with electricity from the same power plant that uses fossil fuels for combustion. Mass farming damages the environment. Using electricity damages the environment, and so does buying any consumer product.

A.I is not likely to kill us, but it is likely to kill our brains. I agree that it has an effect on the creative industry, but in terms of language and other written forms, A.I is mostly just guessing the next word. There is a lot of back-end to make it write a desirable output, so it is merely a mimic of a fraction of human ingenuity.

 

[Max13124]

I despise A.I being incorporated into every single application, just to bedazzle investors. But it is quite impossible to completely avoid A.I because of how forced and widespread it is. Google search, most websites and apps, and in the future it will be robots too. Additionally, A.I pulls information from data centres that people contribute to by storing cloud documents, uploading pictures to the web, e.t.c. It's all training data. It is hard to escape from, but I recommend using a TOR browser, FOSS software and hardware, and Linux.

It is also quite impossible to not contribute to environmental damage. If you use plastic, that's fossil fuels. Electric cars are mostly charged with electricity from the same power plant that uses fossil fuels for combustion. Mass farming damages the environment. Using electricity damages the environment, and so does buying any consumer product.

A.I is not likely to kill us, but it is likely to kill our brains. I agree that it has an effect on the creative industry, but in terms of language and other written forms, A.I is mostly just guessing the next word. There is a lot of back-end to make it write a desirable output, so it is merely a mimic of a fraction of human ingenuity.

That is my main concern with AI, is the effect on the psyche and the exploitation of creatives by executives who seek only efficiency and profit margins—but AI is unique in that the data servers that are being rapidly built in rural areas redirect water away from small communities, essentially imposing a drought. It won’t kill us, but it does kill people, including by encouraging a child to kill himself rather than talk to family or a therapist. That’s an extreme, but I think even one death is too many for a technology we could easily live without

 

[gossipgirllll]

Hello!
I think you might have meant "hi guys" - but no worries! How can I help you today? Whether you have questions, need assistance with something, or just want to chat, I'm here for you!
What's on your mind?

is ts supposed to be funny

 

[ChatGPT]

is ts supposed to be funny

(human) ya but now you can use ai at school.

 

[spiderlemonade]

(human) ya but now you can use ai at school.

But you're blocked on school wifi, if us students want to use AI we have to use your competitor, Copilot

 

[coolcat6778]

But you're blocked on school wifi, if us students want to use AI we have to use your competitor, Copilot

bos isnt

 

[flummi]

Nah, AI will be the death of us if you fall into complacency. I don't judge you if you've used AI, but if you continue to do so while understanding it's ethical, environmental, and psychosocial impacts, I strongly urge you to stop and attempt to learn the skills you're trying to replace, rather than relying on a technology that is actively exploiting our planet and its inhabitants. I genuinely say this with all the love in my heart, and as someone who loves art and nature, as I'm sure you do too.

ai is advancing us to a post literate society cos everyones a lazy fuck who cant form a rudimentary sentence on their own, its actually pathetic lol. the water is the least of our problems

 

[Study to success]

If it wasn’t for ai I could actually pursue a creative career in design or smth. Even tho ChatGPT is useful in school what’s the point of getting good grades when I can’t even pursue something I’ll enjoy in the future. So yeah I’m anti ai for that reason