Class of 2025 (2025 HSC CHAT) (13 Viewers)

[hotitalian]

I understand this situation has become quite heated. I'm not allowed to comment publically on the specifics of an infraction.
However
Please be aware that this did not happen in a vacuum. Today's events happened as a direct result of a week's worth of harassment and challenges to my actions in this thread. Please be aware that users need to respect the decisions of moderators, and that if they decide not to follow a moderator's request, they run the risk of receiving an infraction.

Thank you for understanding.

why the fuck are you acting like a turd nigga? aint u the one who dominated bos or sum shit? tf u turn

 

[harxs]

im not dyslexic thanks tho

i feel like they implied i was, do they get a warning or instant ban like gossip girl did?

 

[tigerian]

Unfortunately, I'll need you to infer that from what i've written in this message, as I am not allowed to publically disclose information regarding to a user's infraction. All those who are confused are encouraged to read my post again.

If I , as a teacher , go guarantor for gossip girl and be her mentor for 2 to 3 days and help her say the right thing would you allow her back . I won’t interfere if it happens again.

would you allow me to help see if I can help her so everything gets sorted out

 

[C2H6O]

if the ban is a result of direct attacks on you, socialism, then i offer apologies on behalf of their actions. however as this is an online forum, differing opinions are inevitable, and to delete and ban all who disagree is, i believe, a step too far, as most if not all users have encountered conflict here. please reconsider an appeal into these events.

 

[Socialism]

I'm going to pause on responding to messages after this so that the situation might cool down, a little.

The posts were removed, and that was the end of that situation. I then reminded users to stay on topic, but a certain user did not respect that request. that is the reason for the ban. Users are free to discuss their thoughts on both Israel and Palestine, in threads that are more appropriate. When I say, "the end of the situation", I mean that moderator actions taken were not as a result of any particular messages posted in that conversation. As i said earlier, it was not just for the one-time defiance. the user had been publically challenging my decisions for several days in the lead-up and the post today was just the catalyst for the ban.

 

[harxs]

i think we started a tyranny

 

[harxs]

I'm going to pause on responding to messages after this so that the situation might cool down, a little.

The posts were removed, and that was the end of that situation. I then reminded users to stay on topic, but a certain user did not respect that request. that is the reason for the ban. Users are free to discuss their thoughts on both Israel and Palestine, in threads that are more appropriate. When I say, "the end of the situation", I mean that moderator actions taken were not as a result of any particular messages posted in that conversation. As i said earlier, it was not just for the one-time defiance. the user had been publically challenging my decisions for several days in the lead-up and the post today was just the catalyst for the ban.

why u in this thread ur class of 2026 go there ur off-topic to our cohort as well..

 

[hotitalian]

I'm going to pause on responding to messages after this so that the situation might cool down, a little.

The posts were removed, and that was the end of that situation. I then reminded users to stay on topic, but a certain user did not respect that request. that is the reason for the ban. Users are free to discuss their thoughts on both Israel and Palestine, in threads that are more appropriate. When I say, "the end of the situation", I mean that moderator actions taken were not as a result of any particular messages posted in that conversation. As i said earlier, it was not just for the one-time defiance. the user had been publically challenging my decisions for several days in the lead-up and the post today was just the catalyst for the ban.

palestine or israel?

 

[quokka]

I'm going to pause on responding to messages after this so that the situation might cool down, a little.

The posts were removed, and that was the end of that situation. I then reminded users to stay on topic, but a certain user did not respect that request. that is the reason for the ban. Users are free to discuss their thoughts on both Israel and Palestine, in threads that are more appropriate. When I say, "the end of the situation", I mean that moderator actions taken were not as a result of any particular messages posted in that conversation. As i said earlier, it was not just for the one-time defiance. the user had been publically challenging my decisions for several days in the lead-up and the post today was just the catalyst for the ban.

your literally letting personal feelings impact your decisions

 

[quokka]

youve just made the situation more worse socialism because you continue to be vague about why she was banned and not the niko person letting us believe you've banned her in favour for your political views...

 

[Socialism]

your literally letting personal feelings impact your decisions

that's... really not what has happened... as i have previously stated, ignoring is an infractable offence. i did not take action on a single post where gossigirl attacked me, but not following moderator requests is an offence. gossipgirl's behaviour leading up to the post backs up the infraction, as a history of these posts can be seen.

 

[harxs]

wow 98 viewers, peak 2025 chat

 

[Socialism]

youve just made the situation more worse socialism because you continue to be vague about why she was banned and not the niko person letting us believe you've banned her in favour for your political views...

i can't believe i'm getting drawn into this.
I support palestine, not israel. i've already stated that the ban had no relationship to the content of the prior conversation

 

[quokka]

that's... really not what has happened... as i have previously stated, ignoring is an infractable offence. i did not take action on a single post where gossigirl attacked me, but not following moderator requests is an offence. gossipgirl's behaviour leading up to the post backs up the infraction, as a history of these posts can be seen.

of what her saying why do mods delete random messages

 

[Socialism]

niko hasn't been banned because we're NOT restricting speech about palestine and israel. gossipgirl was not banned for supporting palestine

 

[shibikoro]

niko hasn't been banned because we're NOT restricting speech about palestine and israel. gossipgirl was not banned for supporting palestine

ok this makes it more clear but what did she do exactly

 

[quokka]

niko hasn't been banned because we're NOT restricting speech about palestine and israel. gossipgirl was not banned for supporting palestine

ok so u just contradicted urself saying that it was off topic for them to be talking abt it

 

[C2H6O]

I'm going to pause on responding to messages after this so that the situation might cool down, a little.

The posts were removed, and that was the end of that situation. I then reminded users to stay on topic, but a certain user did not respect that request. that is the reason for the ban. Users are free to discuss their thoughts on both Israel and Palestine, in threads that are more appropriate. When I say, "the end of the situation", I mean that moderator actions taken were not as a result of any particular messages posted in that conversation. As i said earlier, it was not just for the one-time defiance. the user had been publically challenging my decisions for several days in the lead-up and the post today was just the catalyst for the ban.

i would like to please urge you to make impartial decisions as stipulated by your moderation application. actions such as bans and deletions should not be influenced by personal grievances as this would be an abuse of moderation. furthermore there is no ruling in which a user must stay on topic, thus users did not have probable motive to heed the warning, given that it was made baselessly. please look into the situation again, and if i am wrong then i will leave it at that, but until the argument has been dissected my point stands. thank you.

 

[harxs]

niko hasn't been banned because we're NOT restricting speech about palestine and israel. gossipgirl was not banned for supporting palestine

wallah i still dont like u

 

[tigerian]

youve just made the situation more worse socialism because you continue to be vague about why she was banned and not the niko person letting us believe you've banned her in favour for your political views...

socialism had a reason and it wasn’t personal . It may have been an error but we musnt be judgemental and we don’t need to why . There is a reason it’s confid and we need to respect that whether we agree or not

I wouled like to see justice done and gossipgirl given a chance especially as its a difficult time . Can I ask for a reconsideration regarding gossipgirl along with a notice of what is not acceptable so this issue doesnt continue .

I wont interfere now but I wanted to share that for what it’s worth

regards