asdkfj
New Member
hi guys
would it be ideal/make my argument stronger if my media articles relate to my case? or so i've heard that having multiple perspectives is better? - or is it all in the strength of my arguments/evaluation?
for example -
case: r v skaf case, juror misconduct
media: abc news "juror misconduct leads to retrial"
evaluate: such juror misconduct within the r v skaf case of (EXPLAIN) has to led to (pearjamm), to which this is reflected in "QUOTE ARTICLE" (ABC NEWS, year)
thanksssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
would it be ideal/make my argument stronger if my media articles relate to my case? or so i've heard that having multiple perspectives is better? - or is it all in the strength of my arguments/evaluation?
for example -
case: r v skaf case, juror misconduct
media: abc news "juror misconduct leads to retrial"
evaluate: such juror misconduct within the r v skaf case of (EXPLAIN) has to led to (pearjamm), to which this is reflected in "QUOTE ARTICLE" (ABC NEWS, year)
thanksssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss