it is in the circumstance there is no warrantconsent isn't mandatory lol or search warrants would be useless
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
it is in the circumstance there is no warrantconsent isn't mandatory lol or search warrants would be useless
i said that tooso am i crazy for saying anything they take is admissible evidence![]()
7 marker wasnt contemporary issue rightgonna post my chronological thoughts here
- Multiple choice was my worst section it made me feel so dumb cuz I did it firstoh well
- Knew nothing about peace rights but I think a lucky ICCPR guess will get me 2/3
- They asked for examples plural on a 5 marker? I gave two hopefully it was enough
- I thought the contemporary issue 7 marker was the nicest question on the paper tbh. Very generous and straightforward
- The 15-marker was tough but at least the fears abt transnational were warranted so I got to prepare for it.
- Options were lowkey amazing and both of my prepared essays worked. My assumption is most did option b for family and option a for world order
Some parts of the paper felt kinda bullshit but if I try and ignore negativity bias I think it was ok
Eng Ext1 soldiers I'll see yall over in that thread soon🫡
i did european court of human rights as well i think you needed onefor the 7 marker for hr did u need an international legal measure cause i had constitution, then did dop sop implied and expressed rights and had like an case study or example for all of them and explained how protects hr but idk if i stuffed it with not doing one international
the q was how do legal measures protect human rigthsi did european court of human rights as well i think you needed one
dw I did that too it’s fine it didn’t specify, I got a similar question in trials and got full dwthe q was how do legal measures protect human rigths
helppp i thought it was broad
so i did how statute and common law proteect human rigths![]()
Any human rights issue so it didn’t have to be contemporary7 marker wasnt contemporary issue right
tysm omg i got scareddddw I did that too it’s fine it didn’t specify, I got a similar question in trials and got full dw
For that, I did both international and domestic, and my teacher has always told me that if it's legal measures (unspecified), then do both just to be safe.for the 7 marker for hr did u need an international legal measure cause i had constitution, then did dop sop implied and expressed rights and had like an case study or example for all of them and explained how protects hr but idk if i stuffed it with not doing one international
Mine said it isn’t necessary unless the question is worded like this:For that, I did both international and domestic, and my teacher has always told me that if it's legal measures (unspecified), then do both just to be safe.
my teacher said that they wanted to people to look beyond domestic measures and do international measures. shows a more broader understanding aligned with syllabus. if you said to "somewhat extent", then the inclusion of international is perfectMine said it isn’t necessary unless the question is worded like this:
Explain how effective international and Australian legal responses are to a contemporary human rights issue.
the question was too broad and yes you could’ve identified international measures but that doesn’t guarantee you marks, if the markers wanted international asw they would’ve specified it.
it wasnt rlly a judgement question tho was it? i took it more so as a dump your knowledge of examples etcmy teacher said that they wanted to people to look beyond domestic measures and do international measures. shows a more broader understanding aligned with syllabus. if you said to "somewhat extent", then the inclusion of international is perfect
I don’t remember it being an assess question and yes looking beyond domestic would strengthen ur response but just doing domestic is enough to get the 7 marks asw. My teacher has been a hsc marker for 30 yrs and he said going beyond the question won’t guarantee you extra marks. Obvs in this situation you could’ve referred to both or either. I’m just trying to say even if you only did Australian legal measures it’s sufficient, you wouldn’t lose marks for not referring to international.my teacher said that they wanted to people to look beyond domestic measures and do international measures. shows a more broader understanding aligned with syllabus. if you said to "somewhat extent", then the inclusion of international is perfect
i am a hater of how questions, not even an Alarm verb. honestly if it is a bigger mark, you are kind of expected to integrate evaluation.I don’t remember it being an assess question and yes looking beyond domestic would strengthen ur response but just doing domestic is enough to get the 7 marks asw. My teacher has been a hsc marker for 30 yrs and he said going beyond the question won’t guarantee you extra marks. Obvs in this situation you could’ve referred to both or either. I’m just trying to say even if you only did Australian legal measures it’s sufficient, you wouldn’t lose marks for not referring to international.
Yeah, that's what I always do, a little bit of international for background, then mostly domestic and how it's effective/ineffective or protects/doesn't protect. I don't do it for extra marks; I was just taught that it makes my answers more comprehensible.i am a hater of how questions, not even an Alarm verb. honestly if it is a bigger mark, you are kind of expected to integrate evaluation.
provided someone extensively covered domestic legal measures, you would be fine. same for if you just did international.
oh i was just spreading panic for no reason oopsAny human rights issue so it didn’t have to be contemporary
