Maths Extension 2 Predictions/Thoughts (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter Suze12
- Start date
coolcat6778
Вanned
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2024
- Messages
- 1,966
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2025
What in the fucking IndependentTM marking guidelines?
coolcat6778
Вanned
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2024
- Messages
- 1,966
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2025
Nope, I mean the marking guidelines are ODDLY specific - hence they DO not offer fair differentiation between someone who gets it partially right and someone who doesn't know what they are doing - fuck them.
Attachments
i am more concerned by this
it shows no understanding that the question can be answered entirely without any integration whatsoever:
furthermore it shows no understanding that if integration methods are used then it can be done without substitution
it also does not admit in any way that the question was very poorly worded.
nowhere in the question did it say you had to use integration methods at all and nowhere in the question did it say you had to find k in terms of m and nowhere in the question did it say that if you want to find k in terms of m then use substitution method.
some may try to defend nesa by saying well obviously it's integration so u have to use integration method and obviously u have to use substitution.
well i have shown obviously u don't and obviously u don't
it shows no understanding that the question can be answered entirely without any integration whatsoever:
furthermore it shows no understanding that if integration methods are used then it can be done without substitution
it also does not admit in any way that the question was very poorly worded.
nowhere in the question did it say you had to use integration methods at all and nowhere in the question did it say you had to find k in terms of m and nowhere in the question did it say that if you want to find k in terms of m then use substitution method.
some may try to defend nesa by saying well obviously it's integration so u have to use integration method and obviously u have to use substitution.
well i have shown obviously u don't and obviously u don't
i wonder what they will say at the nesa presentation on feb 21. i bet they are aware of these issues and i bet they will to try to gloss over it as if evading the problem somehow makes the problem go away - like politics. well this isn't politics it's maths - so that's not going to work.