THAJK Ucatalyst sols attached
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
THAJK Ucatalyst sols attached
pH is not necessarily equal to pH. You had to use the equation for Ka and the fact that the ‘p’ means -log_10bro where were we taught this with hsc resources and syllabus?
Pressure increases, so Keq doesn’t change, but the individual concentrations will still change. Only the ratio of concentrations won’t change.what did you guys get for when the inert gas was added to the system of constant volume? was it meant to be eqm doesnt shift because volume is constant so increased pressure doesnt change the concentration of reactants or products? i think i did it wrong
Lol I was wrong before as well, partial pressure is kinda like concentration but for gases. The Keq depends on concentration NOT pressure. The equivalent is “partial pressure” which isn’t pressure.aint no way we trusting chat on this.
Addition of argon increases pressure, causes eq to shift right, as delta H<0 for fwd reaction, T increases. Reason it’s 4 not 3 is cos of added difficulty realising what argon does as apposed to 3 markers, which would just say: pressure increased, what happens to T?
pH at half equivalence was like 4.3 i got 10^-4.3 = 5 x 10^-5. I reckon there might be some leeway cos this way is still technically valid (legit peak taught this)fkkfkfkfkkfkkf got like 7E-5 for titration curve Ka
Bruh this paper eas straight ass fucken 2021-2024 were all easier to me especially 23 i stg if b6 raw for this is not lower than 87 its a straight fucken scam 23 was so easyfkkfkfkkfkfkkfkfkfkfkkfkfkfkfkkfkkfkkkfkkfkfkfkkfk what was that paper
i hate the papers with a bunch of writing; i do better on calc heavy papers (2021)
only things i know i got wrong was the 2 Mg ppt question i said both
also did yall specify base peak for propanoic acid? i didnt specify and just said "other major peaks" and i searched up mass spec and the parent peak is the base peak so is that ok?
also fkn graph question did anyone do a bar chart cause x axis is not quantitative? i did initially but rubbed it out and made it a scatter plot without trendline i think i fkd up
tbh i didnt struggle with it but it doesnt sit right with me
heart rate 120 for the last 7 hours![]()
2023 was so easy and straightforwardBruh this paper eas straight ass fucken 2021-2024 were all easier to me especially 23 i stg if b6 raw for this is not lower than 87 its a straight fucken scam 23 was so easy
i put both will ppt asw and catalyst says the same. also who tf thinks of a bar graph wtf i just did line of best fit and called it a day?fkkfkfkkfkfkkfkfkfkfkkfkfkfkfkkfkkfkkkfkkfkfkfkkfk what was that paper
i hate the papers with a bunch of writing; i do better on calc heavy papers (2021)
only things i know i got wrong was the 2 Mg ppt question i said both
also did yall specify base peak for propanoic acid? i didnt specify and just said "other major peaks" and i searched up mass spec and the parent peak is the base peak so is that ok?
also fkn graph question did anyone do a bar chart cause x axis is not quantitative? i did initially but rubbed it out and made it a scatter plot without trendline i think i fkd up
tbh i didnt struggle with it but it doesnt sit right with me
heart rate 120 for the last 7 hours![]()

omg same i got thatpH at half equivalence was like 4.3 i got 10^-4.3 = 5 x 10^-5. I reckon there might be some leeway cos this way is still technically valid (legit peak taught this)
theyre currently re-checking that soln so it migth be one ppti put both will ppt asw and catalyst says the same. also who tf thinks of a bar graph wtf i just did line of best fit and called it a day? View attachment 50279
dont worry i did a line of best fitBruh i did a stupid line chart instead of bar chart
same who on earth thinks of a bar chart i swear it said draw a curveBruh i did a stupid line chart instead of bar chart
guys ion think we need to have a bar chartI FKN HAD A BAR CHART THEN I ERASED IT FK ME
FK NESA
				